Stalin: In the Wrong? :: essays research papers

Stalin, by many tidy sum today, would be considered a horrible man who had caused much harm to the world. This, of course, is in modern terms. History has a way of reshaping the morality of events over a period of sentence. Take, for example, the Crusades. The majority of Europeans at the time vastly agreed with their purpose. Now, however, they are seen as a religious leaders abuse of power and an unfortunate loss of life. Will the same relapse occur with the view of Stalin? After all, he did completely reshape a backwards society. Since we cannot conceivable travel into the future, Stalin will be assessed from acclaimed people of the past. These people will have no prejudice towards Stalin in their ideals because they will not have known of Stalin nor the Soviet Union. However, their overall opinions will not fluctuate based on Stalin and thus Stalin will be renderd. Stalin will be evaluated by the following three distinguished historical intellectuals Plato, Machiavelli and Sir James G. Frazer.The first person we shall introduce to judge Stalin is the Athenian philosopher Plato. Plato, in his dialogue in the First Book of The Laws, suggests a very open, yet effective, test for selecting and educating men who can be trusted as statesmen. This test, which later became known as the wine test, was supportive of Platos views. It was not simply enough to be a wise ex-soldier, as many people believe Plato choose them to be the most qualified. In the dialogue, Plato states that drunkenness loosens a mans tongue, which gives the presents public an idea what he is really like. By this simple test, Plato would readily support Stalin. Stalin was well-known to drink everyone else under the table. In fact, Stalin imbibed much more than his fellow British counterpart, Sir Winston Churchill, and his successor, Khrushchev. Stalin, being a Georgian, took great assumption in his raising on a diet of mutton and wine, and as he grew, found wine not potent enough, preferr ing to consume vodka. Wine, he said, was unless juice. Stalin, when he drank, rarely fluctuated from what he said when he was sober, proving to be a very consistent man. However, the people that he had at his little shake up-togethers were not, and oftentimes he used the information obtained here to purge later victims. Plato saw the wine test not as a means for him or others to get drunk, but instead loosen the tongue.

College Admissions Essay: Community Leadership :: College Admissions Essays

Community leadership   I had no idea what to expect. The name Leadership Camp stuck out like a sore thumb and I was intrigued by something that attempted to deal with an aspect of my personality that people had always told me I possessed. Rob Geis, a close hero of the family, and one of the organizers of the camp, suggested that I join, and Im very glad I did. Im afraid that giving an adequate explanation of what Leadership Camp offers is virtually impossible because I consider that every one of the 26 students in my group took something different away from it.   I really was, and am, tired of the typical leader characterization executives, dictators, presidents of this-that-and-the-other, bosses, etc. I wanted to see if this group thought outside of the box in that way. I also wanted to calm my tendencies to take over things. My goals were to learn to march on more democratically, to concentrate on being an effective leader without alienating anyone, to seem more like a friend than a dictator, and also to slake my edginess when I am faced with lots of responsibility.   I am still a bit ambivalent on how to feel about Leadership Camp. Basically, every day we concentrated on a specific area of leadership and had a speaker come in to lecture. Each speaker brought his or her own style and it was quite interesting to see the more human, fun, enthusiastic sides of these teachers - aspects to which students in their classes may not be accustomed.   For my Cummunity Leadership Project, I tossed around umpteen ideas. I finally settled on something that grabbed my heart. I read about a Primate Rescue Center (PRC) in a nearby county. this instant I phoned them and began volunteering, once a week for 3 hours each time. I was introduced to 11 chimpanzees (Cory, Ike, Pasna, Tina, Jenny, Rodney, Donald, Hazel, Victoria, and Zulu) and close to 40 monkeys including macaques, colobus, siamang gibbons, a baboon, and others. Becky Wagner and Rachel Weiss , the caretakes and workers there, told me that the Good Foods Co-op apply to donate produce last year, but then somehow there was a breakdown in communication, and that had since ceased.

Essay --

Corporations are contributing to the going parkland epidemic. Going green fashion to pursue knowledge and practices that lead to more environmentally friendly and ecologically responsible decisions and lifestyles (Middletown Thrall Library, 2008). There are several pros and cons that organizations experience when deciding to prove green strategies, therefore the choice must be made carefully to decide whether or not it would be advantageous to their basis.One of the most unambiguous of reasons to become a green comp any(prenominal) is the cost benefit. The operating and material costs that are required for businesses are constantly increasing, therefore in regularise to become more cost efficient, and businesses are recycling more thus reducing productivity costs. With business being able to reduce waste and recycle more of their used goods, they can eliminate the costs it takes to eliminate those resources or to even store them. Eco-friendly policies also help to attract new talent. According to Lindsey Pollak, germ of Getting From College to Career, students are looking to work for companies that care ab break through the environment (Roff, 2007). Organizations can benefit from going green by reducing their energy bills as well. Energy bill reduction can come from utilizing high-efficiency bulbs in discharge. By installing lighting sensors, dimmers and a reflective roof, semiconductor maker Texas Instruments Inc. cut lighting energy at its office building in Richardson, Texas, by 80% (Roff, 2007).On the separate hand, there are other disadvantages related to costs when a business decides to go green. For example, sometimes the costs to install and maintain green materials may not offset the savings in the long or gyp run. In the event that th... ...same point when environmentally friendly practices complement the goal of achieving fiscal soundness and greater profits, companies are more than willing to go green (Gorbett, Salvaterra & Skib a, p.2 2005). In my opinion, the factor that would have the greatest bearing on the beau mondes decision to go green is the cost savings because all other rationales would follow based on if the company felt that the savings would be costs effective in the long run. The organization would not attract any investors or many investors if they feel as thought their investments would be wasted on trying to incorporate a green working environment, then the company would experience a low consumer market as a result. They would be spending more of the investors money on trying to remain green and losing out on the innovative ideas that competitors would have the advantage over.